Akiza Izinski VS Midnight Monarch

This got pretty crazy. He got really angry at me for proving him wrong. The first duel was won by me, fair and square, and we enjoyed it. Once it got to round 2, it went down. We were both at 6,000 life points, when KCVDS froze. He claimed that he was in a good position and had a sure win, but I thought differently. At 6,000 life points, it's still anybody's game. He claims he had brain controls, sakuretsus, and enough to counter anything I threw his way. He claimed that he should win and that we should play the last round for the final duel for DC. I disagreed with him, and explained my reasoning on how there was no way he could determine absolute victory given the circumstances. He got angry then.

At that point, he stopped talking about victory. He decided to insult and flame my dueling deck and strategies. He tells me that I have such a simple strategy, and that it's too easy to play, when his method of bringing out his main monster was equally as simple. He then tells me that he only saw me play 3 monsters on both of the duels. Then, when I named about 80% of my monsters that he saw, he had nothing more to say about my deck.

Then, he moved right on to when I corrected him on his card ruling error. He claimed that he was right, and that because I had Skill Drain on the field, Lonefire Blossom's effect does not work. I told him why it worked, and I explained every part of the ruling. I told him Lonefire's written effect is divided into two parts. The first part is "You can tribute 1 face-up Plant-type monsters to". I told him this part of it was the card cost and the second part of it was "Special Summon 1 Plant-Type monster from your Deck", which is the effect part of it. I explained that Skill Drain only negates the effects of face-up monsters, not costs, therefore I am allowed to tribute Lonefire Blossom. Then the effect part of it resolves not until Lonefire Blossom hits the graveyard, thus free from the bind of Skill Drain, since Skill Drain only affects monsters face-up on the field. Even after I explained this several times very clearly, he still would not believe me. I even gave him a link to a TCG forum, with the question answered, yet he still doesn't believe me, even with 5 people answering the same way, simply because it's not an "official Yu-Gi-Oh" site. He just kept saying that it negates the effect and I can't tribute it cause its on the field. He also tells me that one person on the link I gave him sees it his way, and guess what? It's the person asking the question, which he failed to notice.

After that, he just decided to log out, since he couldn't say anymore. So, admins, please deal with this problem. I'm guessing I'd get the points for the first duel, but as for the rest of it, probably no, eh?

Akiza Izinski wrote:

I'm guessing I'd get the points for the first duel, but as for the rest of it, probably no, eh?

Eh,nope

But,by the way,do you have a screenshot of the first win?
If yes please post it here. In the time i'll Cash in the first duel.

No, I don't. But according to the Luminous Duel Arena rules, confirmation is no longer required, according to Aster Phoenix, Ace, and Kikyo Maaka. So, I didn't feel a need for that, since the first duel was going perfectly fine, no arguments.

Okay. Sorry,didn't read it ._.

Closed.